Is NFT The Future Of Art?

Source : inventa

Satoshi Nakamoto initially surfaced on the Internet in 2008, proposing a mysterious concept for the first completely digital form of currency: bitcoin. Finally, after more than a decade, singers, digital artists, and filmmakers attempt to use the technology that underpins cryptocurrencies to revolutionize the way artists sell their work.

Even as it is democratizing the art market, NFT is the next stage in the art world’s continuing trend toward more financialization. But, unfortunately, this action also links with impending global social fairness, economic viability, and environmental sustainability.

The music business is embracing a new type of cryptocurrency known as a non-fungible token. These “collectible” digital assets may include online artwork or audio downloads. Because each NFT is one-of-a-kind (thus, non-fungible), they effectively serve as collector’s items in the form of a JPG file, for example. The information included in these files (art, music, movies, and so on) gives non-fungible tokens value, allowing them to be purchased and traded in the same way that conventional forms of art are.

Individuals cannot pass off duplicated files as NFTs because each NFT is tied to a blockchain. It is an unhackable digitized spreadsheet that validates the legitimacy of each transaction.


Non-fungible tokens have gone mainstream in recent months as investors poured billions of dollars into the unregulated market in anticipation of hitting it big. For example, Beeple, a digital artist, recently set a new auction record by selling a work of art in the form of a JPEG file for $69.3 million. In addition, CEOs have sold NFTs to raise millions of dollars for fundraisers.

An NFT was resold for more than three times its initial price by a buyer. The premise behind the strong demand for non-fungible tokens is that internet music is valuable simply because they are unique.

NFTs, on the other hand, have grown increasingly contentious in recent years since counterfeit NFTs have become more widespread. The art world—and plagiarism—have been transformed by non-fungible tokens. 

Source: CNet

The notion of NFTs is interesting in and of itself. A typical work of art is of value because it is one-of-a-kind, while an NFT is valuable simply because it is one-of-a-kind. For digital artists, non-fungible tokens can be handy. In addition, many people have tried to benefit from their skill by monetizing it on social media or through commissions. Thus NFTs are essentially the same thing.


Artists generally have their digital work accessible to anybody via the Internet. When artists put up their digital art online, people can quickly share, save, and download it. Because anybody may use it, there is no strong sense of ownership. Now, thanks to NFTs, it’s possible to give digital art a feeling of individuality.

The social environment is entirely responsible for the ownership factor. The attractiveness of these tokens is altogether based on possession and exclusivity. This might increase the number of individuals developing programs that convert an artist’s work into digital items they sell to others.

The majority of digital art available on the Internet is free and open to the public. Unfortunately, some people copy free art from the Internet to market them as NFTs. Once the new file owner makes a purchase, the free work of the original artist is found fraudulent. Thus, the NFTs are not only taking advantage of online artists – and robbing them of their artistic identity.

This threat is far from over for many as they now have the power to seize a single Nyan Cat image. Perhaps another issue surrounding NFTs will sound very stressful: NFTs require very high power consumption.

To sum it up. 

There are many opportunities in the crypto art market in the arts industry. However, many changes will need to be made. First, there should be market regulation. Currently, no law determines who can create NFTs and who can. This allows people to copy the works of artists and sell them at a lower price. There should be a way to ensure that purchase of the pieces before it returns to the market to avoid this issue.

In addition, researchers need to find an environmentally friendly way to use the NFT system. There is no reason to thwart conservation efforts just because you gamble with easy copyable pictures. The process of making and selling crypto art has no respect for our global empowerment, and that needs to change before this practice can continue.

You might also like to read about Iconic Doge meme sold- Breaks NFT records.